Friday, 11 April 2008

Third Front – stability at stake

Election fever is slowly gripping the country.

The next general elections are, of course, due by early next year as the new government has to be installed by the month of May going by the schedule.

But speculation is rife that the ruling Congress, which leads the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) coalition, may go for early polls on the back of the highly populist measures in the Union Budget for 2008-09 and also some other drastic measures like the possible signing of the nuclear deal with the United States; an agreement which the Congress managers believe will take the country a long way in terms of energy security.

Sensing the spirit of the situation, some of the leading players in the country’s political scene have started talking about forming new coalitions and tie-ups. The run-up to the elections happens to be the most favoured season for establishing new equations and liaisons. Among the rest, the CPI(M) has started efforts aimed at reviving the Third Front as a viable alternative to the UPA and the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA).

While addressing the CPI(M)’s 19th Congress at Coimbatore recently, party general-secretary Prakash Karat said: “The need for a third alternative is being felt all the more…It cannot be a mere electoral alliance. We have learnt from our experience of the earlier formations such as the United Front of 1996-98.”

The Left parties – read the CPI(M), the CPI, the RSP and the Forward Bloc – have committed a virtual political suicide by choosing to support the UPA at the Centre as they take on the Congress at the election front in their strongholds such as West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura. They need to do a lot of explaining to convince their committed rank and file and sympathisers over the rationale of such a decision.

The CPI(M), the largest among the Left parties in the country, itself is in an unenviable position. Even after offering unconditional support to the UPA government all these years, the party is far from being impressed over its performance if Karat’s words are any indication. He feels that the government has failed to address vital issues like the agrarian crisis and the steep rise in prices of essential commodities. He also alleged that the Union Government pursued economic policies which benefit big businesses and the affluent. “The overall thrust has been on liberalisation and privatisation,” he said.

It is this dilemma which has prompted Karat and his comrades to take the lead in the attempt to resurrect the long-defunct Third Front once again. It’s not that the Left leader is unaware of the difficulties involved in reaching the magic figure of 272 (the numbers required for a simple majority) in the Lok Sabha with only the non-Congress and non-BJP parties on board his bandwagon. He has already had the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) along with him and hopes to rope in a few more influential regional parties such as the DMK, the National Conference and the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP).

And, even if the Third Front becomes a reality and manages a majority in the Lok Sabha after the elections (which looks quite a distant possibility), the biggest question will involve the stability and longevity of such an experiment. With their damn narrow regional outlook and approaches, most of their allies in the prospective Third Front would prove to be perennial headaches for the champions of the experiment. Even national parties like the Congress and the BJP have a history of wrecking coalition governments at the Centre.

Stability doesn’t necessarily mean avoiding elections for a period of five years and save Rs 1,000 crore (Rs 10 billion) for the exchequer. But it means a lot more and is quite vital for a fast-growing economy like India. For ensuring continuity in policies and economic outlook; for carrying out welfare measures in a proper manner; for maintaining the pace of Gross Domestic Product (GDP); for having a good inflow of foreign capital and a healthy stock market -- stability of governance is a pre-requisite.

The global economy is being shaken by the onset of a recession in the US and the financial crisis is spreading around the world. Still the South Asian economies remain more or less unaffected so far. But the International Monetary Fund has already lowered India’s GDP growth rate forecast to 7.9% in 2008, against the Finance Ministry’s hope of maintaining an average growth rate of 8.8%. This is nothing short of an alarm signal.

It may be recalled that PV Narasimha Rao’s government (1991-96) was able to salvage the country from the jaws of the worst-ever economic crisis in history just because there was political stability all along the five years.

The writing on the wall is quite clear: the nation and its economy crave for a few more decades of political stability.

5 comments:

vikas pandey said...

As always, well written Unni.

Left wing is in a tight spot over their liason with the UPA. They will have to answer some tough questions.

Don't you think Mayawati would be a key player in upcoming elections?

Viewfinder said...

Thanks Vikas.

Not very much, because Mayawati's administration has already started its tryst with controversies as usual. I think Mulayam will finally emerge from the shadows.

Neema said...

Hi Unni

What you say is very true. Stability is what India requires.
But analysing the present situation I wonder if there could be anything called third front, that most of them have it at back of their mind.
The chaos only reminds me of the 'Indian crab' story.

Viewfinder said...

Thanks teachu.

As u said, the Third Front will be a very difficult proposition as most of the regionals would prefer either the UPA of the NDA just to enjoy the fruits of being in power.

But Karat & Co. are striving for it because of their own compulsions.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for writing this.